English

討論區

新增主題回覆返回

發文主題：ICP-bed-to-ratio

建議參考其他國家有二個方案

一,政府出資確保急性床數比1:100,健保難道不是政府出資(2011年

二.不同醫院有不同的人力床位比(2007年)

(1)大型醫院3人:250床

(2)長照1人:100-250床

(3)社區醫院1-1.56:250床

時代在變,怎麼只有加工作沒加人力(佔全院1/10評鑑工作,又有常規的工作)再不改,就有很多人苦腦了

1.The government’s funding has been flowed to hospitals to ensure that all acute care hospitals achieve an ICP/Bed Ratio of 1:100. This represents the best ratio in North America.

北美政府認為ICP-to-bed(ICP床位最佳比率)為1:100---由政府出資給醫院,以碓保急性醫院能維持此一最佳比率(July 7, 2011 NEWS)

參考資料

http://www.mass.gov/Eeohhs2/docs/dph/patient_safety/haipcp_final_report_pt1.pdf. Accessed December 3, 2009.

2.Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) system found the average daily census per ICP was 115 ³¹⁶. Results of other studies have been similar: 3 per 500 beds for large acute care hospitals, 1 per 150-250 beds in long term care facilities, and 1.56 per 250 in small rural hospitals ^{573, 575}. The foregoing demonstrates that infection control staffing can no longer be based on patient census alone, but rather must be determined by the scope of the program, characteristics of the patient population, complexity of the healthcare system, tools available to assist personnel to perform essential tasks (e.g., electronic tracking and laboratory support for surveillance), and unique or urgent needs of the institution and community ⁵⁵². Furthermore, appropriate training is required to optimize the quality of work performed ^{558, 572, 576}.

醫院感染監測（NNIS）系統的人口普查發現(2007)，平均每天每ICP為 115。其他研究結果已經相似：3每500張病床的大型急症護理醫院，每1人150-250張病床長期護理設施，和1.56每250小鄉村醫院。上述情況表明，感染控制人員不能再根據患者單獨普查，而是必須由該計劃的範圍，特點的患者群中，複雜的醫療系統，可用的工具，協助人員執行基本任務（例如，電子跟踪和實驗室支持監察），和獨特的或緊急需要的機構和社區。此外，適當的培訓是必需的優化工作質量進行